Bergman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank | HBOR Dual Tracking FAIL || Chase LOSES on appeal and it costs them 250K PLUS 188K in attorney’s fees

National Debt

national debt

Regulators

Mortgage Related

Government Sponsored

Announcement Date: October 31, 2016
dollar stacks

dollar stacks

Filed 9/30/15

Bergman

v.

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

CA4/2

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and respondent Jeffrey A. Bergman (Bergman) sued defendant and appellant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) on claims involving a residential loan modification. A jury found in favor of Bergman on his causes of action for intentional misrepresentation and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Chase appeals from a $250,000 judgment in favor of Bergman, and the posttrial orders denying Chase’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and granting attorney’s fees to Bergman.

. . .

After the property was sold, Bergman was sued for unlawful detainer. Bergman posted a cash bond of $30,000 with money borrowed from his parents. Bergman incurred additional attorney’s fees defending the unlawful detainer action.

The jury completed the special verdict forms on all seven causes of action and punitive damages. The jury awarded Bergman damages of $125,000 on the cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and $125,000 onthe cause of action for intentional misrepresentation.

. . .

VIII

ATTORNEY’S FEES

The trial court awarded Bergman attorney’s fees—reduced from $454,772.23 to $188,100—finding that he could recover fees under both contract and tort based on the attorney’s fees provision in the original note and trust deed under which the foreclosure was conducted.

. . .

X

DISPOSITION

We reject both appeals and affirm the judgment. In the interests of justice, we order the parties to bear their own costs on appeal.

Down Load PDF of This Case